Little Known Facts About h4831sc load data.

H1000 is on my desire listing of powders in addition. Maybe the IMR Enduron series is going to be nicely favored and I'm able to transfer to that for better availability.

I gave up on it and went to other powder when the new powder was producing more strain and was slower when compared to the outdated stuff. I don't try to remember if I even experimented with regular h4831 or not; I'm wondering not. Simply click to broaden...

The obvious lead to is usually a rough/ruff bore. No quantity of copper fouling lessening agents during the powder will probably right this.

Caution using SC or SSC developed loads with extensive Slash, again off and function up. Use Secure loading techniques.

The one variance as I realize it is that the SC was created to function by way of powder measures better (which it does). The longer grains will not feed properly in any respect in some steps. Thats my 02 :grin:

I understand, tough times. H4831SC will certainly perform, I just did not like the case density when loaded long. I do not try to remember powder charge off the top of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps that's the place I typically goal to become. In your case making use of what you might have (and what I must have carried out) I'd personally begin with the end of the bearing area on the bullet proper in the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there after you find a velocity node.

Any person loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the outcomes, any data you are able to share? Also needs to point out I have some ELD-X a hundred seventy five's I wish to examination out, For those who h4831 vs h4831sc have information on that as well.

Like explained above, very same things. All of that differs is the size on the kernels. I did listen to somewhere that they're going to only make the SC Down the road. I don't know if that's genuine or not but would make sense to me. I use SC mainly because that's what I present in the eight lb jug and it really works.

Together with the smoother move qualities will come more uniform cost h4831sc weights, whilst the individual grains orient extra compactly, producing superior loading density.

Liberalism; The unachievable however acknowledged notion that it's entirely feasible to choose up a turd with the cleanse close.

As for the 4831 vs 4831SC, They're precisely the same/equivalent powder cept for grain size. Load data is interchangeable.

Like Absolutely everyone mentioned, the SC means “limited Lower” and is a bit easier to meter. Makes you problem why they would continue to make the standard a single.

Southwest Idaho I attempted H4831sc in my three hundred WM but experienced far better pace and precision with H1000. I might fairly make use of a slower burning powder with 215g products.

Not surprisingly, sitting around for twenty+ many years (I know a guy who is still utilizing the H4831 he bought from the 60s), implies that melt away costs will probably transform a h4831 vs h4831sc smidge, and new manufacture stuff will probably be marginally distinctive way too.